English logo
Boğaziçi University Library
Digital Archive
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
English logo
Boğaziçi University Library
Digital Archive
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Geyik, Sefa."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How to provide a consistent account of akrasia
    (Thesis (M.A.)-Bogazici University. Institute for Graduate Studies in the Social Sciences, 2009., 2009.) Geyik, Sefa.; Sidiropoulou, Chryssi.
    The aim of this thesis is to provide o consistent solution for the philosophical problem of akrasia. Akrasia, a Greek word, is translated into English as “lacking command over oneself” or “weakness of will”. The question it deals with is this: how can a rational agent, while knowing the best option for him, go for the less beneficial, or harmful course of action? In the thesis, solutions of both ancient and contemporary philosophers are analyzed in detail, and drawing inspiration from Aristotle, an alternative solution is provided. The idea behind the solution is that it is impossible to go for the less beneficial course of action knowingly while you are actively thinking about the action itself. However, it is argued that when you are not actively thinking about the action itself while doing it, it is possible to go for the less beneficial course of action knowingly.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Send Feedback